Customer Reviews
-
good to go
Review by gary -
good ammo - good service, shall order again from bulkammo. Good to go (Posted on 1/9/13)Ammo Performance Bargain? Reliable? -
Great Buy
Review by Johne -
First rounds I used in my new AR.. Purchased because of the name and reviews and this round didn't disappoint. Very affordable, pretty clean burning, and accurate. Great service too. Got the shipment the next day! (Posted on 1/3/13)Ammo Performance Bargain? Reliable? -
Great value, excellent shipping
Review by Yazoodew -
Haven't fired this ammo yet due to the limited availability of 223 right now. You folks slow down on the orders. Don't want to be without if the SHTF. LOL. I expect no problems thru my Colt M4. But the shipping and turnaround on this order was exceptional. Will definitely use BulkAmmo again. I'm a Fan now! (Posted on 1/2/13)Ammo Performance Bargain? Reliable? -
Arrived lightning fast
Review by Tom -
I was shocked at how quickly my order arrived, plenty early to give a a holiday gift. (Posted on 12/26/12)Ammo Performance Bargain? Reliable? -
Great bargain
Review by Danno1843 -
I bought the last25 boxes. Shot 1 box with a windham MPC and ran flawless. Will buy more if we every get any more in. (Posted on 12/25/12)Ammo Performance Bargain? Reliable? -
Great
Review by ar15chefguy -
Love this website! I get all my ammo here. (Posted on 12/10/12)Ammo Performance Bargain? Reliable? -
Great price for some great ammo. Received the ammo in 2 days!! I will shop here again.
Review by Jay -
Great ammo at a great price. Super fast 2 day shipping!! Very satisfied (Posted on 12/1/12)Ammo Performance Bargain? Reliable? -
Awesome price and product
Review by Justin -
Stumbled onto this website and found some great deals! Couldn't be happier with the price and product! Two thumbs up for this website! (Posted on 11/2/12)Ammo Performance Bargain? Reliable? -
practice ammo
Review by ape -
Good Practice Ammo @ 1282 fps (Posted on 8/5/12)Ammo Performance Bargain? Reliable? -
Will recommend to all
Review by Concerned -
Excellent service, delivery and product. Have already referred family and friends to your website.Ammo Performance Bargain? Reliable?
My only concern was that the product was not wrapped and the delivery person ask me "what are you gonna shoot?" (Posted on 8/2/12) -
good stuff
Review by gunlover -
best 223 ammo ever (Posted on 5/6/12)Reliable? Ammo Performance Bargain? -
Will Order More
Review by KM502 -
Was the best price I found on the net. Excellent practice ammo...arrived extremely fast and well packaged! (Posted on 3/22/12)Reliable? Ammo Performance Bargain? -
I would order again
Review by Dwesty -
Shoots true and is pretty clean stuff. I would recomend this (Posted on 3/21/12)Reliable? Ammo Performance Bargain? -
Always a good choice
Review by Miggs -
Good quality, great price, my go to for bulk ammo. (Posted on 3/19/12)Reliable? Ammo Performance Bargain? -
Best price, fast shipping
Review by blp10 -
Received shipment very fast and was packaged well. BulkAmmo.com had the lowest price I found on this ammo. (Posted on 1/3/12)Reliable? Ammo Performance Bargain? -
Reliable Ammo...
Review by MDD496 -
Used during an NRA PAtrol Rifle Instructor School. Zero performance issues. Ran through a 16" Bbl with 1:9 TR. The 55g projectile was sufficient as distances were less than 100 yards. Would use again. Competitively priced and shipped quickly. (Posted on 11/30/11)Reliable? Ammo Performance Bargain? -
Very Happy
Review by Mad Martian -
Good Price, Good Delivery, Good ProductReliable? Ammo Performance Bargain?
Keep up the good work ..............
M/ (Posted on 11/29/11)
Product Question and Answer
Our customer service team has published this Q&A information as a free service to the shooting community. Please note that BulkAmmo.com expressly disclaims any and all liability with regard to how the shooting community might use this Q&A information. See Terms of Use for more details.
Posted On: 10/28/11 By: T Law
Posted On: 10/25/11 By: Douglas
The push for the .223/5.56mm cartridge came out of a 1952 study by a military-funded civilian research group called "Operational Requirements for an Infantry Hand Weapon," as well as several studies and discussions that occurred immediately after World War II. These studies determined that most rifle combat between infantry units took place at 300 meters or less, and that beyond 100 yards, marksmanship was severely reduced. Hits on enemy combatants were seen to be almost random. Because of this, those in positions of power largely decided that the best way to increase the number of enemy casualties was to reduce the caliber of the rifle used by US military units. This would increase short range hit probability by reducing recoil and increase long range hits by allowing the infantryman to carry much more ammunition.
Also, wound ballistics tests at the time determined that small caliber, high velocity projectiles caused more damage than slower, heavier projectiles that did not fragment, expand, or upset in tissue. The US Army's Ballistics Research Laboratory published a study in 1957 titled "Upon Selecting an Optimum Rifle Round" which described a .22 caliber, high velocity, 50 grain bullet that yawed in the target caused increased kill probabilities. This, coupled with a US Army requirement for a cartridge that was effective to 500 yards (despite the earlier study indicating that most rifle combat occurred below 300), led to the modification of .222 Remington ammunition. This new ammunition fired a 55 grain full metal jacket boat tailed bullet at 3300fps. The requirements at 500 yards stipulated accuracy and the ability to penetrate a steel helmet. The new cartridge successfully did so.
Because of institutional belief that larger caliber weapons were better, it was not until 1961 that, at the behest of the Air Force, further testing of the new AR-15 and its .223 Remington cartridge came about. Double the number of shooters scored Expert with the AR-15 versus those firing the M14 rifle in 7.62mm. In addition, the new rifle was found to be easier for soldiers of smaller stature to shoot - in other words, score more hits on their targets.
The bottom line is that the driving factors behind development of the AR-15 and the .223 Remington cartridge - which were closely intertwined - were increased lethality, increased accuracy, lighter weight, and a larger ammunition load per a given weight. There is absolutely no truth to the myth that the .223 Remington cartridge was intended to cause injury instead of death.
